Learn how to be an AASHTO lab 24/7

In this episode of AASHTO re:source Q&A, we dive deep into a new policy that impacts masonry testing standards, aiming to clarify a critical update to ASTM C1716 from 2019. Understanding the latest updates on the dimensional requirements for compression testing machines is essential for laboratories seeking AASHTO accreditation for related test methods.

In this podcast episode, we continue unlocking Section 3.5 of the AASHTO Accreditation Procedures Manual. We delve into the critical themes surrounding laboratory accreditation and the integrity of testing practices, including how hidden conflicts of interest can compromise the impartiality of labs. Our discussion highlights the necessity of independence in judgment and transparency in handling conflict scenarios. This episode provides insights to maintain impartiality and emphasizes how demonstrated job performance can sometimes outweigh formal education in assessing personnel qualifications.

The latest episode of our podcast delves deep into the complexities of AASHTO Accreditation, providing invaluable insights for laboratory professionals aiming to navigate the ever-evolving landscape of accreditation standards. We unravel the intricacies of Section 3.5 of the AASHTO Accreditation Procedures Manual, highlighting the rigorous balloting process that ensures every change is meticulously vetted. This thorough examination emphasizes the significance of the 2018 updates, and hints at some changes to come.

In the world of construction materials testing, the corrective action process often evokes feelings of dread. Yet, what if this process could be seen as a beacon of opportunity? In our latest podcast episode, we introduce and explore the "Four I's of the Corrective Action Process" concept. This fresh approach transforms common sense ideas into a memorable strategy that enhances the understanding of the process while keeping continual improvement as its focus.

In the ever-evolving world of construction materials testing, the introduction of new standards can significantly impact industry practices. One such development is the AASHTO R 119 standard, officially titled “Standard Practice for Grinding the Ends of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens.”

In this episode of AASHTO Resource Q&A, we tackle a frequently asked question that has significant implications for construction materials laboratories: Who should perform your aggregate and rebar assessments—CCRL or AASHTO re:source? This seemingly straightforward question opens a complex discussion about the best choice for your lab’s assessment needs.

In our latest podcast episode, we delve into the transformative power of the AASHTO re:source Specifier Feature, a pivotal tool for modernizing laboratory monitoring. Greg Uherek, the Manager of Business Development and Technical Services, provides valuable insights into how this innovative tool is revolutionizing the way agencies, like DOTs and California's Division of the State Architect, manage their accreditation processes. For both public and private entities, the AASHTO re:source Specifier Feature offers a streamlined approach to maintaining compliance with stringent testing standards.

In the latest episode of our podcast, we delve into the strategic vision and volunteer leadership that drive the development and maintenance of the AASHTO materials standards. We are joined by Matt Linneman, Chief Engineer for North Dakota DOT and Chair of the Committee on Materials and Pavements (COMP), and AASHTO liaison Casey Soneira. This episode offers an in-depth look at the essential roles leaders play in ensuring the materials used in our infrastructure are of the highest quality, while also highlighting the critical role of volunteers in maintaining and updating standards.

In the latest episode of the AASHTO re:source Q & A Podcast, “Rolling Forward: Exploring the New Hamburg Wheel Track Proficiency Sample Program”, the hosts, with guests John Malusky and Ryan LaQuay, dive into the details of an exciting new addition to the Proficiency Sample Program (PSP). This episode is a must-listen for anyone involved in balanced mix design and testing and quality assurance, as it introduces this new sample type.

Discover the fascinating journey of Benjamin Trujillo, a quality management expert who transitioned from construction materials testing to tackling the stringent standards of the nuclear industry. This podcast episode sheds light on the crucial role of quality assurance in diverse sectors and offers valuable insights into operationalizing quality systems. Join us as we delve into Benjamin’s experiences, strategies, and the lessons he has learned along the way.

Achieving and maintaining AASHTO Accreditation is a cornerstone for just over 2,000 laboratories in the construction materials industry. The latest episode of our podcast, " Mastering AASHTO R 18: Common Pitfalls," delves into the intricacies of AASHTO R 18 conformance, the basis of the AASHTO Accreditation Program. This episode uncovers common problem areas and offers actionable strategies to help labs excel in quality management.

What if your organization could lead a quality management revolution? In this insightful episode, Bob Lutz, Director of AASHTO re:source, unveils the organization's ambitious roadmap for 2024-2027. The goal is to build a community of quality advocates who are committed to continual improvement.

After a five-month hiatus, season five of the AASHTO re:source Q&A podcast kicks off with a revamp of sorts. In the first episode of the season, released on July 30, 2024, we dive into a treasure trove of updates, listener insights, and sneak peeks into what’s coming this season.

On season 4 episode 32 we discuss common nonconformities for ASTM C138, C172, C173, C231, C617, C1231 and how to resolve them.

On season 4 episode 29 we discuss common nonconformities for ASTM C31, C39, C78, and C511 and how to resolve them.

On season 4 episode 26 we discuss common nonconformities for ASTM C1077 and how to resolve them.

A Quality Management System serves as an important driving force toward achieving quality of products and services. Including the ISO/IEC 17025 standard to your scope of accreditation is a formal recognition of the lab’s technical and organizational competence. The decision to pursue the ISO/IEC 17025 quality standard should not be made lightly or without complete clarity, as there is a cost to the business. Conforming to this rigorous standard demonstrates the lab’s willingness to go above and beyond the customer’s minimum requirements to provide quality service. Whether it’s your first time or something your lab has been through in the past, preparing for an ISO/IEC 17025 assessment can be overwhelming and nerve-racking. This is because there are many pieces to the ISO/IEC 17025 puzzle, and the fear of something not working seamlessly in real-time is quite tangible. Following the five tips presented in this article and addressing them ahead of time can make the lab assessment seamless, straightforward, and a vindication of the lab’s good practices.

On season 3episode 20. we discuss how as AASTHO members, state DOTs can best use AASHTO re:source’s services.

On season 2 episode 35 we discuss common nonconformities for the Standard Method of Test for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) and how to resolve them.

On season 2 episode 31 of the podcast, we discuss common nonconformities for the Standard Method of Test for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Fine Aggregate and how to resolve them.